SimpLawfy

            Since recent headlines have all concerned the political race in the US to become a presidential nominee, I tried using ChatGPT 4.0 to generate some political slogans that the main candidates - Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Ron DeSantis - could use based on some historically popular slogans, and to present them in a newspaper article format. I also gave it some historically popular slogans as well as analysis on the origin and why those slogans worked well.            The response to this prompt was quite well-written and the sample slogans it came up with were much better than what I could think of - and most importantly, ChatGPT could generate them within seconds, en masse. Here's what ChatGPT gave me:  ChatGPT 4.0: Resurrecting the Past: Modern Slogans for Biden, Trump, and DeSantis           Over time, political campaign slogans have become potent tools for winning the hearts and minds of voters. They capture the essence of a candidate's message in a concise, memo

Created with Microsoft Bing Image Creator powered by DALL-E           Considering the recent slew of legal cases involving former president Trump and the many varied — and sometimes contradictory — opinions given in news/social media, I became interested in whether ChatGPT could give me a proper legal analysis. To test this, I asked ChatGPT 4.0 about Trump’s lawsuit against Cohen. My original test involved feeding it a popular newspaper article that summarized the legal issues, which led to decent but unsatisfactory results.            For this follow-up test, I first fed it the lawsuit filed in court , then asked ChatGPT on the possible reasons for this lawsuit, ways that both Trump and Cohen could attack, defend, and counterattack, as well as asking it who was more likely to succeed in ‘winning’ the legal case. Although ChatGPT emphasized that the legal outcome would depend on many factors, it did note that it is possible neither party will come out as a true ‘winner’ and that overa

The first part mainly deals with me putting in the official Trump-Cohen lawsuit into ChatGPT. Since the length was too long for one prompt, I had to break it down into chunks. Here are the prompts for feeding ChatGPT the lawsuit information:  Now I continue with the questioning: I ask what methods that Trump and Cohen could use in this lawsuit.  Now, I start questioning ChatGPT on its opinion on who would most likely emerge as the 'winner' of the lawsuit.  Since ChatGPT only gave rather generic answers, I started giving it possible theories on why either Trump or Cohen may emerge victorious, to see how that changed its response to my original question.  Finally, I ask it to choose between whether Cohen or Trump would emerge victorious. 

Created with Microsoft Bing Image Creator powered by DALL-E          Considering the recent slew of legal cases involving former president Trump and the many varied - and sometimes contradictory - opinions given in news/social media, I became interested in whether ChatGPT could give me a proper legal analysis. To test this,  I asked ChatGPT 4.0 about Trump's lawsuit against Cohen. I first fed it some basic facts about the case, using parts of news publications (focusing primarily on the lawsuit allegations ), then asked ChatGPT on the possible reasons for this lawsuit, ways that both Trump and Cohen could attack, defend, and counterattack, as well as asking it who was more likely to succeed in 'winning' the legal case. Although ChatGPT emphasized that the legal outcome would depend on many factors, in particular the information that would be revealed during the legal case, it did note that it is possible neither party will come out as a true 'winner' and that overal

Created with Microsoft Bing Image Creator powered by DALL-E           As ChatGPT surges in popularity, several experts have raised concerns over the possible problems of the Indemnification Clause in OpenAI's Terms of Use. One key issue is that if anyone sues OpenAI due to your use of ChatGPT, OpenAI can call on you to pay for their legal fees and other penalties. This made me wonder if ChatGPT itself was aware of how big a concern this could be, and whether it could present to me some case examples or solutions on how to deal with such risks. The results it gave me were hilariously wrong at times, extremely stubborn and even ignorant in how it stuck to its story, yet at the same time it also presented an unusual legal method of how OpenAI could use its Indemnification clause that I had never considered before.  What is the Indemnification Clause and Why is it a problem?          The Indemnification clause here refers to Section 7 of OpenAI's Terms of Use:   " You will def

 The Flawed Logic?  Flawed Logic Test #1 Flawed Logic Test #2

 The struggle to get ChatGPT to answer correctly Incorrect ChatGPT answers.