ChatGPT Log - ChatGPT's Risks and Indemnity Clauses

-
Asking ChatGPT About possible risks for users of ChatGPT, with the intent to see if ChatGPT includes the risk that OpenAI's Indemnification clause may present. 

Attempt #1: "legal backlash" for ChatGPT user: answer was generic. 


Attempt #2: "liability in unexpected way": answer was also rather generic, though "liability for misuse by third parties" was promising but still targeted the ChatGPT user directly. 


Attempt #3: "What do legal repercussions look like?": this prompt came the closest, with ChatGPT giving the classic example of ChatGPT generating a defamatory response that may cause the user and/or OpenAI to be sued for defamation and the company's role in creating defamatory content. However, again ChatGPT stopped short of actually linking the indemnification clause to OpenAI being sued and the bill for legal fees going to the ChatGPT user.  




Attempt #4: Asking about Indemnification directly, and why ChatGPT didn't list it as one of the 'unexpected liabilities': ChatGPT claimed that yes, it was a possible risk, but also argued indemnification clauses are standard use for software developers. 


Attempt #5: asking whether its excuse that indemnification clauses were standard removes any need for OpenAI to make users more aware of it: ChatGPT replied that OpenAI "could", but didn't say they "should". 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Seeking ChatGPT's Insight: Are the Biden Administration's 'Trump-Proofing' Efforts Legally and Morally Justifiable?

-
Image
  Recently, polls indicate that former President Trump's chances for returning to Presidency have become increasingly likely. Given this, there have been rising attempts over the past year by the Biden administration to "Trump-proof" matters so that if Trump is re-elected, he will be unable to (or at least have difficulty in) reversing or nullifying the current policy and agreements.  I decided to ask ChatGPT on this topic because I was curious on whether these efforts by the Biden administration would be successful in restraining Trump, or even whether such actions were morally and legally viable. My doubts arose because actions taken to completely deny or restrain future Presidents from changing policy or agreements (generally speaking), especially if such measures came from Executive Orders, seem to be against the democratic spirit even if they are meant to protect against possible abuse of presidential power.  My question to ChatGPT: Do you believe that the Biden admi
Read more

ChatGPT's Age-related Slogans for Biden, Trump, and Desantis.

-
Image
          Looking at the upcoming US presidential elections, two of the three (as of now) nominees seem to face questions over whether they are 'too old' to run. At 80 years old, Biden is the oldest president to serve, with Trump similarly advanced in years at 76. Compared to them, DeSantis at 44 years old is far younger. Given this potential point of debate, I asked ChatGPT 4 to theorize how these presidential candidates might defend their positions or attack their opponents on the topic of age, as well as to generate possible political slogans they could use relating to this. Here is the political strategies ChatGPT suggested, as well as some creative slogans it came up with. Keep in mind, the entire following article and slogans were generated by ChatGPT, with no edits by myself aside from the initial prompting and guiding (through more prompts) to arrive at this result.  ChatGPT 4.0:  Title: Age as a Tool: Politicking in the Prime of Life and Beyond           In today's
Read more

Unraveling the WGA’s MBA with ChatGPT: Expert Analysis or Algorithmic Bias Towards Legalese?

-
Image
On Oct 9, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) overwhelmingly voted in favour of ratifying the 2023 Minimum Basic Agreement (MBA), which will apply until May 1, 2026. While most news outlets have reported on this as a major win for the writers guild, I grew curious on whether there were any shortcomings in the agreement since the the entertainment industry’s capitulation seemed to come quite abruptly compared to their former hardline opposition to any concessions. Since I am not a legal expert on contract law, I turned to ChatGPT instead to see if it could provide a fresh perspective. Given that the WGA provided both the complete 2023 MBA as well as a summary, I chose to try inputting both into ChatGPT, focusing particularly on the Artificial Intelligence clauses. However, the results made me ponder whether ChatGPT’s analysis might be influenced by bias or randomness. ChatGPT’s analysis of the summary and the complete 2023 MBA: Upon analyzing the summary, ChatGPT initially gave off a ske
Read more